°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > Àú³Î > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 50 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â

Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ|µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) 2024³â 10¿ù

±â»ç¸í ¼ö¿ø½Ã °æ°üÇùÁ¤»ç¾÷ »çÈĺм®À» ÅëÇÑ Á¦µµ °³¼± ¹æÇâ - ÇùÁ¤Ã¼°áÀÚ FGI(Focus Group Interview)¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î / Suggestions for Improvement of the System through Post-mortem on Landscape Agreement Projects in Suwon - With Special Emphasis on FGI of the Signatories
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÀüÀºÁÖ(Jeon, Eun-Joo)
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) , Vol.25 No.5(Åë±Ç Á¦125È£)(2024-10)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(43) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(17)
ISSN 15980650
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î °æ°üÇùÁ¤; ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ; ÃÊÁ¡Áý´ÜÀÎÅͺä ; Townscape Agreement; Monitoring; Focus Group Interview
¿ä¾à1 2007³â °æ°ü¹ýÀÌ Á¦Á¤µÇ¸é¼­ °æ°üÀ» °ü¸®ÇÏ°í º¸Á¸ÇÏ¿© Áö¿ªÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ »õ·Î¿î µµ½Ã°èȹÀÇ ºÎºÐÀ¸·Î ÀÚ¸® Àâ¾Ò´Ù.?? °æ°ü¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ÁÖ¹ÎÀº ÁÖüÀûÀ¸·Î ¡®°æ°üÇùÁ¤¡¯À» ü°áÇÏ¿© Áö¿ªÀÇ °æ°ü°èȹÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù.?? º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼ö¿ø½ÃÀÇ °æ°üÇùÁ¤»ç¾÷ »ç·ÊÁö 5°÷Áß 3°÷(°ÅºÏ½ÃÀå±æ,?? ¼º´ë¤ý¹ã¹ç°Å¸®,?? Çâ±³·Î~Çà±Ã·Î ±Ù´ë¹®È­°Å¸®)ÀÇ °æ°üÇùÁ¤Ã¼°áÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÑ FGIºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ °æ°üÇùÁ¤ Á¦µµ °³¼± ¹æÇâÀ» µµÃâÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.?? °æ°üÇùÁ¤ È°¼ºÈ­¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â ±âȹ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ Àü¹®°¡ÀÇ ±³À°°ú Á¶·ÂÀÌ Áß¿äÇϸç ÇàÁ¤°ø¹«¿øÀÇ ½ÇõÀû Áö¿øÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.?? ¶ÇÇÑ °æ°üÇùÁ¤ÀÇ ÁÖüÀÎ ÁÖ¹ÎÀÌ ÀÌ¿ô ÁÖ¹ÎÀ» Á÷Á¢ ¼³µæÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇùÁ¤ÀÇ ¼º°øÀû ü°á¿¡ Áß¿äÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.?? À¯Áö°ü¸® °­È­¸¦ À§ÇØ °æ°üÇùÁ¤¿î¿µÈ¸ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ ¹× Àǹ«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çÀü ±³À°ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸçÇàÁ¤¿¡¼­ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú ÈÄ¼Ó »ç¾÷À» ¿¬°èÇÏ¿© À¯Áö°ü¸® ´Ü°è¿¡¼­µµ Á¶·ÂÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.?? º»¿¬±¸´Â Àü¹®°¡ °üÁ¡ ¹× ¼³¹®Á¶»ç,?? ¸¸Á·µµ Á¶»ç¸¦ È°¿ëÇÑ ±âÁ¸¿¬±¸¿Í ´Ù¸£°Ô ü°áÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î°æ°üÇùÁ¤ÀÇ ±âȹ ¹× ¸¸·á±îÁö Àü ±â°£À» µ¹¾Æº¸´Â ½ÉÃþÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ½Ã»çÁ¡À» µµÃâÇÑ Á¡¿¡¼­Àǹ̸¦ °®´Â´Ù.??
¿ä¾à2 With the enactment of the LANDSCAPE ACT in 2007, managing and preserving landscapes to shape local identity became a new part of urban planning. Under the LANDSCAPE ACT, residents can establish local landscape plans by signing 'landscape agreements' on their own. This study aims to derive suggestions for improving the landscape agreement system through FGI analysis of landscape agreement signatories in three of the five case sites of landscape agreement projects in Suwon. To revitalize landscape agreements, education and assistance from experts are important in the planning stage and practical support from public servants is necessary. In addition, convincing neighbors to sign the agreement must be actively implemented by residents, who are the main parties to the agreement, to achieve the agreement. In the maintenance stage, preliminary education on the roles and duties of the landscape agreement steering committee is necessary, and the administration should also support the maintenance stage through continuous monitoring and follow-up linkage projects. This study is significant in that it draws implications through in-depth interviews with signatories, looking back at the entire period from the planning to the expiration of the landscape agreement, unlike existing studies that focus on expert perspectives, surveys, and satisfaction surveys.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2024.10.25.5.43