| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) , Vol.17 No.5(Åë±Ç Á¦77È£)(2016-10) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ÇÊÁö°áÇÕ ; °áÇÕ°³¹ß ; °áÇÕ°ÇÃà ; ¿ëÀûÀÌÀü ; ³ëÈİÇÃ๰ ; °ÇÃàÇùÁ¤ ; µµ½ÃÀç»ý ; Lot Merger ; Conjoint Development ; Combined Architectural Development ; Transfer FAR ; Deteriorated Building ; Building Agreement ; Urban Regeneration |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÃÖ±Ù µµÀÔµÈ °ÇÃàÇùÁ¤Á¦µµ ¹× °áÇÕ°ÇÃà¹æ½Ä°ú ÇÊÁö °£ °áÇÕÀ» ÅëÇØ ¿ëÀûÀÌÀüÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ¹Ì±¹°ú ÀϺ»ÀÇ Á¦µµ¸¦ ºñ±³¡¤ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ÇâÈÄ °áÇÕ°ÇÃà¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ³ëÈİÇÃ๰ÀÇ °ÇÃ๰ ´ÜÀ§ Àç»ýÀ» Ȱ¼ºÈ½Ã۱â À§ÇÑ ¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, Á¦µµÀÇ È°¿ëÀ» ÃËÁøÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Á¦µµ°¡ Àû¿ëµÇ´Â °ø°£Àû ¹üÀ§¸¦ Á¡ÁøÀûÀ¸·Î È®´ëÇÏ´Â ÇÑÆí, ¹«ºÐº°ÇÑ °³¹ßÀ» ¹æÁöÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Àû¿ë ´ë»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼ºÎÀûÀÎ ±âÁØ Á¦½Ã¿Í Áö¿ªº°·Î Â÷º°ÈµÈ °³º° °ÇÃ๰´ÜÀ§ ¿ëÀû Çѵµ±âÁØÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌÀÇ °ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇØ º°µµÀÇ ´ëÀå ¿Ü¿¡ µî±â, Áß°³´ë»ó¹° È®ÀΡ¤¼³¸í¼ µîÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇâÈÄ °ÇÃàÇùÁ¤Á¦µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °áÇÕ°ÇÃàÀ» º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¿î¿µÁöħÀÌ ¸¶·ÃµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ̸ç, º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÊÁö °£ °áÇÕÀ» ÅëÇÑ °ÇÃ๰ ´ÜÀ§ Àç»ýÀÌ º¸´Ù Ȱ¼ºÈ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëÇÑ´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
This study aims to compare and analyze the system of building agreement and combined architectural development of Korea and the methods of lot merger used in the United States and Japan which enables sharing of the FAR between the combined lots and suggest the direction to activate regeneration of deteriorated building by this system. The results are as follows: 1) It is necessary to expand the applicable areas gradually in order to activate the use of lot merger and to make more specific criteria for the urban environment. 2) It is needed to differentiate the limit of the FAR on an individual lot in consideration of it's regional characteristics. 3) In addition to the special cadastre for building agreement, real property registration and the brokerage object confirmation are needed. With this study, it can be expected to use building agreement and lot merger more effectively to activate urban regeneration by building unit. |