¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) , Vol.17 No.5(Åë±Ç Á¦77È£)(2016-10) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¿ª»ç¡¤¹®È ȯ°æ ; °³¹ß±Ç¾çµµÁ¦ ; ¿ëÀû°¡Ä¡ ; Historic Cultural Resources ; TDR ; Value of Floor Area Ratio |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ª»ç¡¤¹®È ȯ°æÀÇ º¸Á¸±â¹ýÀ¸·Î¼ °³¹ß±Ç¾çµµÁ¦ÀÇ µµÀÔ¹æ¾È¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¿¬±¸Çϸç, ½Ç½Ã¸ðÇüÀ» ´ë±¸±¤¿ª½Ã Áß±¸¿¡ Àû¿ëÇØº½À¸·Î¼ ±× Ȱ¿ë°¡´É¼º¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ¼ö¿ëÁö¿ªÀÇ °³¹ß±ÇÀÌ ¼ÛÃâÁö¿ªÀÇ Àüü °³¹ß±ÇÀ» ¸ðµÎ ¼ö¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö¸¸, 1:1ÀÇ ÇüÅ·δ °Å·¡°¡ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¼öÁØÀ» º¸ÀδÙ. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿ª»ç¡¤¹®È ȯ°æÀÇ º¸Á¸±â¹ýÀ¸·Î¼ °³¹ß±Ç¾çµµÁ¦´Â Çö½ÇÀûÀ¸·Î ÇѰè´Â Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö¸¸ ÃæºÐÈ÷ Ȱ¿ë°¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. µÑ°, ÇöÀç ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó´Â ½Ã¡¤±º¡¤±¸ Á¶·Ê¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ëÀû·üÀÌ Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô ¿ÏȵǾî ÀÖ¾î ½ÃÀåÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ °³¹ß±Ç¾çµµÁ¦ÀÇ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ» ¿ì·Á°¡ Å©´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó, ¿ª»ç¡¤¹®È ȯ°æÀÇ º¸Á¸±â¹ýÀ¸·Î¼ °³¹ß±Ç¾çµµÁ¦¸¦ µµÀÔÇϱâ À§Çؼ´Â ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ë±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ °È ¶Ç´Â ¹Ðµµ ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© °³¹ß±ÇÀÇ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ À¯¹ßÇϸç, ¿ëÀû·ü Àμ¾Æ¼ºêÁ¦µµÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀûÀÎ ¿î¿µÀ» ÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study aims at identifying feasibility of transfer of development right (TDR) as a tool for historic preservation in urban area. To achieve it, developing an implementation model and applying it to Joong-gu, Daegu as a pilot case. The results of this study based on the model can be summarized as follows. First, the model shows applicability of TDR for historic preservation that although it may be difficult for the receiving area to expropriate the entire development rights from the sending area, it can be possible to achieve a one-to-one development right transaction. Second, the current regulations for floor area ratios at the local municipality level are so loose that there may not be sufficient demands for TDR. Therefore, to make TDR successful as a tool for historic preservation, strong regulation for land use and development density combined with FAR(Floor Area Ratio) incentives should be necessary. |