문헌홈 > 저널 > 상세

한국생활환경학회|한국생활환경학회지 2006년 6월

기사명	Evaluation of Control Methods of Ice Thermal Storage Systems
저자명	Pyeongchan Ihm ; 이상진
발행사	한국생활환경학회
수록사항	한국생활환경학회지 , v.13 n.2(2006-06)
페이지	시작페이지(127) 총페이지(6)
ISSN	1226-1289
주제분류	환경및설비
주제어	; EnergyPlus ; Ice thermal storage system ; Controller ; Energy savings
요약1	The HVAC systems require large amount of electrical energy use to maintain cooling setpoint temperature duringsummertime. Especially, 60% of total energy use in the United States is consumed in operating HVAC systems and plants incommercial buildings during summer. To increase the efficient electrical management ice thermal storage (ITS) systemsoperated during nighttime can reduce the daytime peak electrical demand and expect the electrical energy cost savings in abuilding. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effective control method of ITS systems to achieve the potentialbuilding energy cost savings. Therefore, conventional ITS control strategies including chiller-priority control and ice storage-priority control strategies are compared to optimal ITS control strategy. This research concluded that optimal ITS controlachieve 16% and 27% higher savings that those obtained by chiller-priority and ice storage-priority control, respectively.
소장처	한국생활환경학회
언어	영어

분석서지

건축환경 및 설비 > 건축설비 > 열원설비 The HVAC systems require large amount of electrical energy use to maintain cooling setpoint temperature duringsummertime. Especially, 60% of total energy use in the United States is consumed in operating HVAC systems and plants incommercial buildings during summer. To increase the efficient electrical management ice thermal storage (ITS) systemsoperated during nighttime can reduce the daytime peak electrical demand and expect the electrical energy cost savings in abuilding. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effective control method of ITS systems to achieve the potentialbuilding energy cost savings. Therefore, conventional ITS control strategies including chiller-priority control and ice storage-priority control strategies are compared to optimal ITS control strategy. This research concluded that optimal ITS controlachieve 16% and 27% higher savings that those obtained by chiller-priority and ice storage-priority control, respectively.