¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹»ýȰȯ°æÇÐȸÁö , v.12 n.2(2005-06) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
; Thermal Environment ; Perimeter Zone ; Air-barrier system ; Solar Radiation |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ³Ã¹æ±â ¿È¯°æÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÃµÁ¤ÃëÃâ ¹æ½Ä°ú Air-Barrier ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ºÎÇÏ󸮼º´ÉÀ» ºñ±³¡¤Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®À» ÅëÇØ ½Ç³» ¿ÂµµºÐÆ÷¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ¿© ¿îÀüÁ¶°Ç¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¼º´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¿¡¾î¹è¸®¾î ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Àû¿ë½Ã ½Ç³» ¿È¯°æÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ¿îÀüÁ¶°Ç¿¡ µû¸¥ Ư¼ºÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
For the purpose of investigating the effective removal of cooling load from light-weighted building envelope, two air-conditioning systems, conventional all-air and air-barrier system, are evaluated and compared by both experiment and simulation with three different cases during cooling season. The characteristics of window-side building thermal load are assessed by varying supply air velocity in order to seek the optimal system operation condition. The results are as follows. Air-barrier system is more effective to remove solar radiation through glass at perimeter zone than conventional all-air system. The experiment results provide that capturing efficiency to evaluate the effective removal of building load from perimeter zone shows high value when supply air velocity is 1 m/s. |